Diagnostic Value of Optical Spectral Transmission in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Associations with Clinical Characteristics and Comparison with Joint Ultrasonography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To examine the value of optical spectral transmission (OST) in detecting joint inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate whether OST correlates with certain patient characteristics. Methods. OST measurements were performed in the metacarpophalangeal, proximal intraphalangeal, and wrist joints of 168 patients with RA and 114 controls. OST difference between the 2 groups was statistically examined and subsequently controlled for the effect of possible confounding factors. Diagnostic OST performance was tested by receiver-operating characteristics. Moreover, associations of OST with clinical and serological activity markers (patient group), joint ultrasound (US; patient subgroup) and various anthropometric and epidemiologic parameters (patient and control group) were evaluated by Spearman correlation coefficient and a generalized linear statistical adjustment model. Results. OST was significantly higher in the RA group than in the control group, even after adjustment for confounding factors (1.89; 95% CI 0.709–3.070, p adj = 0.002). Taking US as a reference, area under the curve for all 1251 joints simultaneously was 0.67 (95% CI 0.631–0.709). In the patient group, correlation and adjustment analyses showed associations of OST with various disease activity markers [28-joint count Disease Activity Score (rho 0.313), swollen joint counts (rho 0.361), C-reactive protein (rho 0.389); all, p adj = 0.001], age (rho 0.276, p < 0.001), and osteoarthritis (p = 0.022). Moreover, OST associated with a power Doppler US score (rho 0.442; p = 0.001) and a greyscale US score (rho 0.591; p < 0.001). In both groups males had significantly higher OST values than females and OST associated moderately weakly with body mass index (rho patients 0.316, rho controls 0.24; all, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Patients with RA showed higher OST values in comparison to controls. Moreover, OST associated with clinical, US, and laboratory disease activity markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".