MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014428003 · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001480

Invasive Stratified Mucin-producing Carcinoma (ISMC) of the Cervix

2020· article· en· W3014428003 on OpenAlexaff
Simona Stolnicu, Sheila Segura, Carlos Parra‐Herran, Lars‐Christian Horn, Lynn Hoang, Cristina Terinte, Anna Pesci, Sarit Aviel‐Ronen, Takako Kyokawa, Isabel Alvarado‐Cabrero, Esther Oliva, Robert A. Soslow, Kay J. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsPathologyAdenocarcinomaAdenosquamous carcinomaMucinMedicineCarcinomaBiologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (ISMC) is a recently described tumor with similar morphology to the stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion. Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesion and ISMC likely arise from human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected reserve cells in the cervical transformation zone that retain their pluripotential ability to differentiate into various architectural and cytologic patterns. This is important, as small studies have suggested that ISMC may be a morphologic pattern associated with more aggressive behavior than usual HPV-associated adenocarcinoma. We sought to study the morphologic spectrum of this entity and its associations with other, more conventional patterns of HPV-associated carcinomas. Full slide sets from 52 cases of ISMC were reviewed by an international panel of gynecologic pathologists and classified according to the new International Endocervical Criteria and Classification system. Tumors were categorized as ISMC if they demonstrated stromal invasion by solid nests of neoplastic cells with at least focal areas of mucin stratified throughout the entire thickness, as opposed to conventional tall columnar cells with luminal gland formation. Tumors comprising pure ISMC, and those mixed with other morphologic patterns, were included in the analysis. Twenty-nine pure ISMCs (56%) and 23 ISMCs mixed with other components (44%) were identified. Other components included 13 cases of usual-type adenocarcinoma, 6 adenosquamous carcinoma, 3 mucinous-type adenocarcinoma, 1 high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. ISMC displayed architectural diversity (insular, lumen-forming, solid, papillary, trabecular, micropapillary, single cells) and variable cytologic appearance (eosinophilic cytoplasm, cytoplasmic clearing, histiocytoid features, glassy cell-like features, signet ring-like features, bizarre nuclei, squamoid differentiation). Awareness of the spectrum of morphologies in ISMC is important for accurate and reproducible diagnosis so that future studies to determine the clinical significance of ISMC can be conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207