Accurate and Precise Time-Delay Estimation for Ultrasound Elastography With Prebeamformed Channel Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Free-hand palpation ultrasound elastography is a noninvasive approach for detecting pathological alteration in tissue. In this method, the tissue is compressed by a handheld probe and displacement of each sample is estimated, a process which is also known as time-delay estimation (TDE). Even with the simplifying assumption that ignores out of plane motion, TDE is an ill-posed problem requiring estimation of axial and lateral displacements for each sample from its intensity. A well-known class of methods for making elastography a well-posed problem is regularized optimization-based methods, which imposes smoothness regularization in the associated cost function. In this article, we propose to utilize channel data that have been compensated for time gain and time delay (introduced by transmission) instead of postbeamformed radio frequency (RF) data in the optimization problem. We name our proposed method Channel data for GLobal Ultrasound Elastography (CGLUE). We analytically derive bias and variances of TDE as functions of data noise for CGLUE and Global Ultrasound Elastography (GLUE) and use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to prove that CGLUE provides a TDE with lower bias and variance error. To further illustrate the improved performance of CGLUE, the results of simulation, experimental phantom, and ex-vivo experiments are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".