MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014442254 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.044301

High-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math>, two-quasiparticle states in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Gd</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>160</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2020· article· lv· W3014442254 on OpenAlexaff
D. J. Hartley, F. G. Kondev, G. Savard, J. A. Clark, A. D. Ayangeakaa, S. Bottoni, M. P. Carpenter, P. Copp, K. Hicks, C. R. Hoffman, R. V. F. Janssens, T. Lauritsen, R. Orford, J. Sethi, S. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Naval AcademyNuclear PhysicsOffice of Defense Nuclear NonproliferationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateQuasiparticleSpin (aerodynamics)Atomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excited states in $^{160}\mathrm{Gd}$ were populated via $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay from the low- and high-spin isomers in $^{160}\mathrm{Eu}$. The high-spin, ${K}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={5}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ state feeds several two-quasiparticle levels, as well as a sequence associated with a $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ vibration and a ${K}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={4}^{+}$, hexadecapole vibrational structure. The decay scheme was significantly improved with the observation of new transitions and states when compared with the two competing level schemes from over four decades ago. Configuration assignments for some of the multiquasiparticle levels have been suggested, based upon decay properties, systematics from neighboring nuclei, and comparisons with theoretical calculations. In addition, 15 new low-spin states and approximately 60 new transitions were observed resulting from the decay of the low-spin $^{160}\mathrm{Eu}$ isomer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207