MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3014457916 · doi:10.4095/322170

40Ar/39Ar biotite, muscovite, and hornblende ages from the Cape Smith belt and Superior Craton, northern Quebec

2020· report· en· W3014457916 on OpenAlexaffabout
D R Skipton, M R St-Onge, Nancy Joyce

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHornblendeBiotiteMuscoviteCratonGeologyCapeGeochemistryArchaeologyGeographyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Open File presents forty-nine new 40Ar/39Ar step-heating analyses of biotite, muscovite and hornblende from Paleoproterozoic strata of the Cape Smith belt and Archean orthogneiss of the Superior Craton in northern Quebec, Canada. Geological mapping and sample collection were conducted in the Cape Smith belt and surrounding Superior cratonic basement by the Geological Survey of Canada during 1985-1987 (mapping is summarized in St-Onge et al., 2007). In the portion of the Superior Craton located south of the Cape Smith belt, known as the Minto Block, geological mapping and sample collection were performed by the Geological Survey of Canada in 1961-1963 (Stevenson, 1968) and 1973 (Taylor, 1982). The 40Ar/39Ar thermochronological analyses presented here were carried out on thirty-two metaplutonic, metasedimentary and metavolcanic samples along a north-to-south transect across parautochthonous and allochthonous units and their bounding crustal structures in order to (i) delineate possible domains with different cooling histories and (ii) provide new insights into the post-collisional history of the Trans-Hudsonian orogenic front. Age determinations were conducted in 2004 at the Geological Survey of Canada Noble Gas Laboratory facility in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→