Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is suggested that psychiatric disorders play a role in the pathogenesis of alopecia areata (AA), and the disease itself can lead to psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study is to evaluate the levels of depression, anxiety, and alexithymia in AA patients and to determine their relationship with the clinical features of the disease. The study included 73 AA patients and 73 healthy individuals. All participants were evaluated with the Beck depression scale, Beck anxiety scale and Toronto alexithymia scale. The severity of depression and anxiety symptoms of the patients were found to be significantly higher than the controls (p=,001 and p=,003, respectively). It was observed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the level of alexithymic properties (p =,059). In AA patients, there was no statistically significant relationship between psychiatric symptoms and the patient's age, duration of the disease and severity of the disease (p> 0.05). A significant relationship was observed between the level of depression and the sex of the patient (r = 0.43; p = 0.042). Consequently, because of the symptoms of depression and anxiety in AA patients, patients should not only be handled in terms of skin lesions but also should be evaluated psychologically and should be referred to the psychiatry outpatient clinic when necessary. Thus, we think that the success of treatment can be increased. Keywords: Alopecia areata, Depression, Anxiety, Alexithymia. Special Issue of Health Sciences DOI: 10.7176/JSTR/6-03-16
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".