Dynamic Contact Angle and Corrosion Test Measurements on Cu and CuO-Stearic Acid Modifications on Steel Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a copper (Cu) coated steel surface’s dynamic con-tact angle and corrosion rate was compared to the bare steel and stearic acid modified surfaces. Various steps of surface treatment have been performed including electrodeposition of Cu, CuO formation from H2O2 immersion with stearic acid modi-fication to obtain dynamic contact angle and the corrosion rate data. The Cu-coated steel’s dynamic contact angle was increased as it implied the surface after Cu treatment was more hydro-philic than the bare steel, with sliding angle and contact angle hysteresis of 54.9o ± 2.39o and 39.5o ± 1.91o, respectively. How-ever, corrosion test measurements by using a mass loss method to quantify the corrosion rate showed that Cu-coated steel and stearic acid-modified Cu-O coated steel had no remarkable dif-ference in corrosion rate. It was found that the Cu-coated steel and stearic acid-modified Cu-O coated steel had corrosion rate eight times slower than the bare surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".