Los indígenas de la isla Nutka, los otomís, los antiguos mexicanos y las ruinas de San Juan de los Llanos (hoy Cantona) en la Gazeta de Literatura de 1790
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The erudite scholar and editor Antonio Alzate y Ramírez published in his La Gazeta de Literatura (8 February 1790, capital of New Spain) his first study about the cultural connections he discovered between the natives of Nootka Archipielago (today West Canada), the ancient Mexicans, the Otomis and the distant place of their origin. Alzate added to this publication a complete transcription of an early report written by Licenciado Ruiz Cañete in 1786 of an ancient settlement in San Juan de los Llanos, which ruins are located in the State of Puebla, today known as Cantona (probably the earliest documental record of this archaeological zone). A few years later Luxembourgian traveller and archaeologist Guillermo Dupaix visited this site after reading Alzate’s text which was considered lost by some archaeologists for several decades in the 20th century or doubted about its existence. An appendix to this article includes a complete transcription of the report on the ruins of San Juan de Los Llanos, published by Alzate in this Gazeta, Why did Alzate publish this text at this particular date in his Gazeta?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".