MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014583102 · doi:10.1063/1.5144121

Demonstration of scalable microring weight bank control for large-scale photonic integrated circuits

2020· article· en· W3014583102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAPL Photonics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency
KeywordsScalabilityPhotonic integrated circuitPhotonicsElectronic circuitElectronic engineeringComputer scienceCalibrationResonatorIntegrated circuitCrosstalkModulation (music)Optical switchChannel (broadcasting)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microring resonators (MRRs) are reconfigurable optical elements ubiquitous in photonic integrated circuits. Owing to its high sensitivity, MRR control is very challenging, especially in large-scale optical systems. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate continuous, multi-channel control of MRR weight banks using simple calibration procedures. A record-high accuracy and precision are achieved for all the controlled MRRs with negligible inter-channel crosstalk. Our approach allows accurate transmission calibration without the need for direct access to the output of the microring weight bank and without the need to lay out electrical and optical I/Os specific for calibration purpose. These features mean that our MRR control approach can be applied to large-scale photonic integrated circuits while maintaining its accuracy with manageable cost of chip area and I/O complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it