MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014611328 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13607

Reframing MAiD in the Media: Rationalizing and Normalizing a New Mode of Dying in Canada

2019· dissertation· en· W3014611328 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jasmine Macaulay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCognitive reframingConsciousnessMode (computer interface)Key (lock)Media studiesSocial mediaSociologyPolitical scienceLawPsychologySocial psychologyComputer securityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the examination of media discourse during three key periods from the 1990s to 2018, this thesis will demonstrate how Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) has historically, and is presently, being constructed in the Canadian mass media. This thesis will demonstrate how this reporting is impacting the nation's social consciousness, effectively normalizing and rationalizing the fledgling practice as a legitimate new mode of dying in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207