MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014641796 · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ab72f1

Principles governing photometry (2nd edition)

2020· article· en· W3014641796 on OpenAlex
Yoshi Ohno, Teresa Goodman, Peter Blattner, J. Schanda, Hiroshi Shitomi, Armin Sperling, Joanne C. Zwinkels

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotometry (optics)Computer scienceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This document brings together the definitions and the tables of numerical values for photometry already adopted (or recommended) and published, by the Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures (CGPM), by the Comité International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM), or by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). This document provides the link between the definition of the candela in the International System of Units (SI) and the internationally agreed spectral luminous efficiency functions for human vision published by the CIE, including those for mesopic vision and for photopic vision for a 10° field of view, in addition to those for photopic vision for a 2° field of view and for scotopic vision. The definitions of photometric units and quantities have also been updated with the reformulated definition of the candela in the International System of Units (SI) 2019 and the latest definitions of the photometric quantities by the CIE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it