Aliphatic Hydrocarbons in Recent Dated Sediment Cores of Imo River, SE Nigeria: Environmental/Historical Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four recent sediment cores (0-30 cm long) from Afam (AF), Mangrove (MG), Estuary (ES) and illegal Petroleum refinery (PT) sites of the Imo River, Southeastern Nigeria were analyzed to characterize the sources and distribution of organic matter (OM), as well as examine their historical trends of deposition and assess human-induced changes in the last ca. 5 decades using biomarker approach. Radionuclides 210Pb and 137Cs were used to assign approximate dates to each section of the cores. Evaluation of proxy parameters such as carbon preference index (CPI, 2.01 - 2.19), carbon number maximum (Cmax, 29, 31) and atomic C/N (16.51-31.32) for the most recent top layers (0-5 cm) revealed greater wash-in of land-derived organic matter (OM), attributable to the recent rise in water height. The bottom layer (PT1, 25-30 cm,) of the PT core deposited ca. 1964-1972 exhibited a CPI of 0.97 and pristane/phytane (Pr/Ph, 3.75), suggesting that oil bunkering/illegal refinery activity had begun in the region ca. 8 years after the first commercial discovery of oil in Nigeria in 1956. The occurrence in high abundance of heptadecane in the middle layer (ES4, 10-15 cm) of the ES almost corresponded with the period of eutrophication that blocked the waterway in the late 1980s. Measurement of a marked unresolved complex mixture at the near-top layer (AF5, 5-10 cm) of the AF indicated that the heaviest contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons occurred at ca. 1997-2005. This time frame coincided with the period of intensive bunkering and oil pipeline vandalism by Niger Delta militant groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".