DMFLDA: A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting lncRNA–Disease Associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A growing amount of evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in the regulation of biological processes in many human diseases. However, the number of experimentally verified lncRNA-disease associations is very limited. Thus, various computational approaches are proposed to predict lncRNA-disease associations. Current matrix factorization-based methods cannot capture the complex non-linear relationship between lncRNAs and diseases, and traditional machine learning-based methods are not sufficiently powerful to learn the representation of lncRNAs and diseases. Considering these limitations in existing computational methods, we propose a deep matrix factorization model to predict lncRNA-disease associations (DMFLDA in short). DMFLDA uses a cascade of non-linear hidden layers to learn latent representation to represent lncRNAs and diseases. By using non-linear hidden layers, DMFLDA captures the more complex non-linear relationship between lncRNAs and diseases than traditional matrix factorization-based methods. In addition, DMFLDA learns features directly from the lncRNA-disease interaction matrix and thus can obtain more accurate representation learning for lncRNAs and diseases than traditional machine learning methods. The low dimensional representations of the lncRNAs and diseases are fused to estimate the new interaction value. To evaluate the performance of DMFLDA, we perform leave-one-out cross-validation and 5-fold cross-validation on known experimentally verified lncRNA-disease associations. The experimental results show that DMFLDA performs better than the existing methods. The case studies show that many predicted interactions of colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and renal cancer have been verified by recent biomedical literature. The source code and datasets can be obtained from https://github.com/CSUBioGroup/DMFLDA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".