MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014740468 · doi:10.26443/crae.v46i2.83

Artistic Inquiry in Art Teacher Education: Provoking Intuition through a Montage of Memory in and of Place / 1.Recherche artistique et formation des enseignants en arts : susciter l’intuition par le biais d’un montage de la mémoire des lieux

2019· article· en· W3014740468 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Adrienne Boulton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIntuitionHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyArtCognitive science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In this paper, I discuss research that explored the emergence of an intuitive disposition through teacher candidate participants’ artistic inquiry of their former school spaces and the conceptualization of time as montage to articulate novel pedagogical conditions in teacher education. Through filmmaking, participants performed as nomads, responding both physically and aesthetically to their affective responses to memory in place. In doing so, individuated memories of their mundane experiences of schooling emerged, disrupting recollected discourses about why they teach. This suggests the importance of artistic practice in teacher education pedagogical practices and the value of learning through rather than from experience. Keywords: Teacher Education; Artistic Inquiry; Montage; Intuition; Memory; Time; Experience.Résumé : J’aborde dans cet article la recherche menée sur l’émergence d’une attitude intuitive au regard de la quête artistique des futurs enseignants vis-à-vis leurs anciens espaces scolaires et la conceptualisation du temps sous forme de montage pour introduire de nouvelles modalités pédagogiques en matière de formation des enseignants. Par la réalisation de films, les participants deviennent des nomades qui réagissent de manière physique et esthétique, à leur perception affective de leur mémoire en place. Ce faisant, le souvenir individualisé de la perception ordinaire de leurs études émerge, altérant le discours remémoré sur les motifs derrière leur volonté d’enseigner. Cela dénote l’importance de la pratique artistique au niveau des pratiques pédagogiques de la formation des enseignants et la valeur de l’apprentissage à travers l’expérience même plutôt que tirée de l’expérience.Mots-clés : formation des enseignants ; recherche artistique ; montage ; intuition ; mémoire; temps ; expérience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistiqueSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207