MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014743184 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v11n1p259

International Experience and Trends in E-Learning Development in World Economy

2020· article· en· W3014743184 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Quyen Le Hoang Thuy To Nguyen, Phong Thanh Nguyen, Vy Dang Bich Huynh, Loan Phuc Le

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
KeywordsScope (computer science)Order (exchange)Context (archaeology)Investment (military)Subject (documents)Economic growthE learningPolitical scienceHigher educationBusinessEconomicsKnowledge managementEducational technologyComputer scienceGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes and synthesizes the international experience with e-learning in order to draw lessons for its development in Vietnam’s higher education. The e-learning development policies of selected countries are analyzed to measure the success of such policies against their specific national context. This paper also discusses Vietnam’s experiences in terms of national policy goals, the scope and subject of the policies, the investment resources and their allocation, and their approach to e-learning and massive open online courses (MOOCs) in higher education in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207