MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014760544 · doi:10.1111/hae.14001

The COVID‐19 pandemic: New global challenges for the haemophilia community

2020· letter· en· W3014760544 on OpenAlexaff
Cédric Hermans, Alain Weill, Glenn F. Pierce

Bibliographic record

VenueHaemophilia · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hemophilia Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaemophiliaClotting factorMedicinePandemicHaemophilia AImmunologyIntensive care medicineFactor IXVirologyDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)PediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few decades, several blood-borne viruses have targeted haemophilia patients requiring treatment with clotting factors derived from human plasma.1 Even today, many haemophilia patients and their families still retain painful and indelible memories of HIV and hepatitis C infections or are confronted with the progressive health consequences of these infections. Long considered true enemies of haemophilia patients, viruses, at least some of them, have now become partners in the cure of haemophilia as demonstrated by the successes of gene therapy clinical trials.2, 3 It is indeed possible to cure haemophilia by using viruses, deprived of most their content and infectivity, as vectors to transport genetic material and permit long-term, endogenous production of factor VIII or factor IX by the transduced liver in quantities sufficient to maintain haemostasis. Beyond these successes and reinforced by past experiences, the emergence of new infectious agents is a constant concern for the haemophilia community. For this reason, the last few decades have been devoted to improving the infectious safety of clotting factor concentrates derived from human plasma and especially to the development of clotting factor concentrates produced by recombinant DNA technology in the laboratory independently of the addition of any human or animal protein.4-6 A new disease (COVID-19) caused by a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that appeared in China at the end of 2019 is currently invading the world7 (Table 1). This emerging virus, spreading from person to person via respiratory droplets, is mainly responsible for respiratory tract infections and potentially fatal pneumonia in more frail patients.8 Current available data show that the mortality is very low in those <20 year of age but much higher, up to 20%, in older patients presenting with comorbidities. The pandemic is not short term. The current containment measures aim at decreasing the rate of new infections so that enough ventilators are available to support patients who need them. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus It is impossible to estimate at the present time how many patients with haemophilia will become infected and whether their factor deficiency and their treatment could influence the manifestations of the infection, its natural course, treatment and consequences. It seems clear, however, that the current pandemic will have definite consequences, direct or indirect, immediate or delayed, on the management of haemophilia worldwide. In this context, it seems appropriate to try to identify these likely consequences in order to best manage the current challenges and anticipate major difficulties in the longer term. The major concern and priority are to ensure access to haemophilia treatment. The delivery of replacement therapies through pharmacies, hospitals or home delivery programs could be impacted. Haemophilia treatment centres are working hard to avoid such problems. The situation is totally different for the many countries whose only supply relies on the WFH humanitarian aid program.9 The current paralysis of air transport may slow or impede the transport of replacement products and access to treatment for an undefined period of time. The production of recombinant DNA produced replacement products (ie FVIII, FIX, FVIIa, emicizumab) is not expected to be affected by the pandemic unless production plants run out of components of the production process, which seems unlikely. There could be also be a major challenge if there is insufficient workforce available to continue production due to an expanding cohort of infected skilled workers. Contamination of the production lines of synthetic replacement products with SARS-CoV-2 from workers is highly unlikely. The situation may be quite different for plasma-derived clotting factors if plasma donations are reduced due to the deferral of infected donors and fear of donating blood and plasma. Already, as happened with the HIV epidemic in the 1980s, blood and plasma donations are down due to the mistaken understanding donors may be at increased risk of COVID-19. Viral inactivation during the production process of plasma-derived clotting factors eliminates SARS-CoV-2, a lipid-enveloped virus like HIV.10 The increasing containment and mobilization of hospitals to treat patients infected with CoV-2-SARS worldwide will make access to treatment centres difficult, if not impossible. This may have consequences on medical follow-up, assessment consultations, specific treatments (immune tolerance induction), therapeutic education programs and diagnostic procedures including laboratory testing. Treatment centres must rapidly adapt to this reality by taking advantage of all means of distance communication such as telemedicine and maintain regular contacts with patients, especially those who require more attentive and regular follow-up.11 Elective surgeries have been postponed in areas where hospitals need conserve resources for the overwhelming onslaught of COVID-19 patients. Clinical research programs are negatively impacted by the pandemic. This includes the initiation and continuation of clinical studies. It is currently not possible to initiate new studies or to recruit new patients, for both logistical and health reasons. Haemophilia centres are taking steps to adapt the monitoring of patients currently included in clinical studies by ensuring access to treatment and appropriate follow-up. In practice, as a consequence of these major disruptions, some experimental therapies will be evaluated with delays, some clinical trials may be interrupted or stopped, and the introduction of many new treatments will likely be postponed. The pandemic will also result in the cancellation of many educational or research activities planned for the year 2020 (expert and consensus meetings, congresses, patient training camps, community support groups etc) that are essential to advancing the knowledge and care of haemophilia throughout the world. These are all lost opportunities that will have to be reactivated. Even if communication technologies make it possible to maintain interactions between major stakeholders, they do not replace the richness of direct human-to-human contacts. However, efforts should move toward optimizing virtual meetings since this pandemic will not disappear soon. The economic and social consequences of the pandemic will be major. It is impossible today to evaluate the impact on the funding of haemophilia worldwide, both in terms of reimbursement for treatments and financial support for haemophilia centres. It seems obvious that the entire community must prepare for a difficult financial situation. Many patients already socially and/or professionally weakened by haemophilia could suffer even more from the economic and social consequences of the crisis. They will have to be helped so as not to add financial, social and professional difficulties to the burden of the disease and its treatment. This text is not intended to be pessimistic but realistic. The current situation requires us to be vigilant, to be proactive in monitoring the situation on a daily basis, to anticipate for a long duration a ‘new-normal’, to work closely together, and to be innovative. Our bleeding disorders' global community has experienced more than one crisis. This one is as different as it is unexpected. Together, we can all face it and learn the necessary lessons from it. This letter reflects the positions of Cedric Hermans Editor-in-Chief of the Haemophilia Journal and Medical Member of the Board of the WFH, Alain Weill President of the WFH, and Glenn Pierce Medical Vice-President of the WFH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.284
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaemophiliaSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207