MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014864494 · doi:10.1111/ajt.15886

Hepatitis B surface antigen–positive donor to negative recipient lung transplantation

2020· letter· en· W3014864494 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sara Belga, Dima Kabbani, Karen Doucette

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHealth Resources and Services Administration
KeywordsMedicineHBsAgEntecavirTransplantationHepatitis B virusBasiliximabHepatitis BLiver transplantationImmunosuppressionGastroenterologyInternal medicineImmunologySurgeryLamivudineTacrolimusVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: A 63-year-old man presented with hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to newly diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Three weeks after his initial presentation, a compatible but increased risk donor with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) became available. A decision was made to accept the available lungs because the patient’s clinical condition was deteriorating rapidly and the chances of survival were otherwise slim. Due to previous cardiac surgery resulting in mediastinal adhesions, a single right lung transplantation was performed. The patient received induction immunosuppression with basiliximab and maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose prednisone. The recipient was negative for HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), with no documented immunization before transplantation. The donor had low-level hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, at 38 IU/mL, at the time of procurement and was confirmed to have negative hepatitis delta serology. The recipient received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) immediately before and after lung transplantation daily for 7 days. Entecavir was initiated immediately after surgery. HBV serologies at 12 months after transplantation revealed positive anti-HBc and anti-HBs titers of 58 IU/mL, but negative HBsAg and HBV DNA. Postoperative course was complicated by slow weaning from the ventilator. The patient was discharged home 4.5 months after transplantation and his lung function remains stable with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 71% of predicted at 18 months after transplantation. He will continue entecavir lifelong, and repeat HBV markers, including HBV DNA, every 6 months for the second year posttransplant. HBV D+/R− organ transplantation is rarely considered in nonendemic regions due to limited outcome data. Chronic HBV infection is highly prevalent in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, with about 350 million people chronically infected worldwide. Given the scarcity of organs and the increasing number of transplant candidates on the waiting list, expanding the donor pool to include donors with chronic HBV infection in urgent nonrenal transplant candidates must be considered.1Huprikar S Danziger-Isakov L Ahn J et al.Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management.Am J Transplant. 2015; 15: 1162-1172Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar, 2Levitsky J Doucette K AST Infectious Diseases Community of PracticeViral hepatitis in solid organ transplantation.Am J Transplant. 2013; 13: 147-168Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, 3Te H Doucette K. Viral hepatitis: guidelines by the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Disease Community of Practice.Clin Transplant. 2019; 33: e13514Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar It is important to note that antiviral drugs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, are safe and effective to prevent and/or control HBV infection posttransplant. There are presently no published studies on the use of HBsAg-positive donors in lung transplantation, and limited evidence is available in heart transplantation.1Huprikar S Danziger-Isakov L Ahn J et al.Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management.Am J Transplant. 2015; 15: 1162-1172Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar Based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data as of October 18, 2019, there were 23 HBV D+/R− (HBsAg-positive-to-negative) transplants, 14 hearts and 9 lungs, out of 48 199 thoracic organs transplanted between February 1, 2009 and February 28, 2019; however, a total of 54 lungs from anti-HBc-positive and/or HBsAg-positive donors were discarded out of a total of 2056 discarded lungs. OPTN patient survival data from HBsAg-positive donors suggest comparable outcomes in lung transplant recipients (Figure 1). Studies from Taiwan have reported successful heart transplantation from HBsAg-positive donors.4Ko W-J Chou N-K Hsu R-B et al.Hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplant recipients in a hepatitis B endemic area.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001; 20: 865-875Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 5Wang S-S Chou N-K Ko W-J et al.Heart transplantation using donors positive for hepatitis.Transplant Proc. 2004; 36: 2371-2373Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar, 6Chen YC Chuang MK Chou NK et al.Twenty-four year single-center experience of hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplantation.Transplant Proc. 2012; 44: 910-912Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar With appropriate antiviral and/or immunoprophylaxis in HBV-naïve patients, no HBV-related morbidity or mortality was encountered.6Chen YC Chuang MK Chou NK et al.Twenty-four year single-center experience of hepatitis B virus infection in heart transplantation.Transplant Proc. 2012; 44: 910-912Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar In conclusion, the use of HBsAg-positive donors must be considered in urgent thoracic transplantation; we demonstrate good short-term outcome with combination of antiviral therapy and HBIG. Optimal monitoring strategies and duration of antiviral prophylaxis should be addressed in future studies. The authors would like to thank Dr Ali Kapasi and the Alberta Lung Transplant Program for the assistance given in the successful management of this case. This work was supported in part by Health Resources and Services Administration contract 234-2005-37011C. The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. Conceptualization: Sara Belga, Dima Kabbani, and Karen Doucette. Supervision: Karen Doucette. Writing of original draft: Sara Belga. Survival analysis: Dima Kabbani. Review and Editing: Sara Belga, Dima Kabbani, and Karen Doucette. All the authors were directly involved in the patient’s care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207