Study of effective coupling between charge degrees of freedom in low dimensional hole-doped quantum antiferromagnets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expressions for the generalized charge stiffness constant at zero temperature are derived corresponding to low-dimensional hole-doped quantum antiferromagnets, describable by the t–J-like models, with a view to understanding fermionic pairing possibilities and charge couplings in itinerant antiferromagnetic systems. A detailed comparison between spin and charge correlations and couplings are presented for the strong and weak coupling limits in one (1D) and two (2D) dimensions. The result highlights that the charge and spin couplings show very similar behaviour in the over-doped region in both dimensions, whereas they show a completely different trend in the lower doping regimes. A qualitative equivalence of the generalized charge stiffness constant with the effective Drude weight and Coulomb interaction is established based on the comparison with other theoretical and experimental results. The fall in charge stiffness with increase in doping then implies a reduction in magnitude of the effective Coulomb repulsion between the mobile carriers. This leads to an enhanced possibility of fermionic pairing with an increase in doping concentration, in the possible presence of some other attraction-producing mechanism from a source outside the t–J-like models. Moreover, under certain conditions in the optimal doping region, the t–J-like models themselves are able to produce an attractive interaction for pairing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".