MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014944646 · doi:10.1063/1.5144714

Efficient noise reduction for the free induction decay signal from a proton precession magnetometer with time-frequency peak filtering

2020· article· en· W3014944646 on OpenAlexaff
Huan Liu, Hongpeng Wang, Junchi Bin, Haobin Dong, Jian Ge, Zheng Liu, Zhiwen Yuan, Jun Zhu, Xinqun Luan

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFoundation of Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory
KeywordsNoise (video)MagnetometerPhysicsNoise reductionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Free induction decaySIGNAL (programming language)AcousticsInstantaneous phaseFrequency modulationNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer scienceOpticsMagnetic fieldRadio frequencyTelecommunicationsSpin echoArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proton precession magnetometer (PPM) is a commonly used device to measure the varying magnetic field. Since the frequency of the PPM sensing free induction decay (FID) signal is proportional to the magnetic field, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is always a critical issue that influences the measurement accuracy severely due to the external interferences such as harmonic noise and random noise. In this study, to boost the SNR of the FID signal, an effective filtering algorithm based on time-frequency peak filtering (TFPF) analyzed with pseudo-Wigner-Ville distribution (PWVD) is proposed. Through pre-treating the collected noisy FID signal with frequency modulation and instantaneous frequency estimation using the peak value of the time-frequency characterization, the embedded noise can be decorrelated and the relative pure FID signal can be detected regardless of the impact of varying noise levels. The superiority of the proposed synaptic noise reduction framework, namely, TFPF-PWVD, was found by comparing it with state-of-the-art approaches under the same conditions. The results illustrated that even though in a strong-noisy scenario, the proposed TFPF-PWVD based approach still achieved the best SNR for the yielded sensing FID and the minimum standard deviation for the observed magnetic field data, which can enhance the geomagnetic measuring performance of a PPM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207