MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Atuação da Psicologia hospitalar, breve histórico e seu processo de formação no Brasil

2020· article· pt· W3014966190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia Argumento · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsEntomological Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo busca mostrar a importância da inserção do psicólogo no âmbito hospitalar. Tendo em vista o caráter de tratamento, considerando o indivíduo em sua totalidade, o artigo discute também a trajetória da formação do psicólogo e principalmente a falta de inserção dos acadêmicos e profissionais nessa área em todo o Brasil, que tem apenas os grandes centros como referências. Essa área que poucos conhecem, apresenta multitarefas, com o objetivo de ajudar o paciente e o familiar a lidarem com os aspectos psicológicos do adoecimento e do processo de internação. A opção metodológica da pesquisa foi uma revisão bibliográfica de artigos acerca da Psicologia Hospitalar, mais conhecida mundialmente como Psicologia da Saúde. Para isso, foi feito um apanhado de diversos autores sobre o tema, e posteriormente a fundamentação entre eles com base na temática escolhida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it