MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015045404 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.19921

Voyages pittoresques et romantiques: littérature et patrimoine dans la première moitié du xixe siècle, G. Zaragoza

2019· article· fr· W3015045404 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Arrous

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette livraison regroupe les actes d’un colloque organisé dans le cadre de l’exposition Charles Nodier et les “Voyages pittoresques” (Paris, Musée de la vie romantique, octobre 2014-janvier 2015). Aux dix-neuviémistes qui n’ont pas encore eu le bonheur de visiter en détail le monument conçu par Taylor, Nodier et Dauzats (19 volumes, 1820-1878), elle apportera de riches compléments aux travaux de Juan Plazaola et de Bruno Foucart. Dans son introduction («Vous avez dit “pittoresque”?» pp. 11-24...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207