Structural integrity of white matter tracts as a predictor of acute ischemic stroke outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical assessment scores in acute ischemic stroke are only moderately correlated with lesion volume since lesion location is an important confounding factor. Many studies have investigated gray matter indicators of stroke severity, but the understanding of white matter tract involvement is limited in the early phase after stroke. This study aimed to measure and model the involvement of white matter tracts with respect to 24-h post-stroke National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients (50 females, mean age 66.4 ± 14.0 years, median NIHSS 5, interquartile range: 2-9.5) with follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging data sets acquired one to seven days after acute ischemic stroke onset due to proximal anterior circulation occlusion were included. Lesions were semi-automatically segmented and non-linearly registered to a common reference atlas. The lesion overlap and tract integrity were determined for each white matter tract in the AALCAT atlas and used to model NIHSS outcomes using a supervised linear-kernel support vector regression method, which was evaluated using leave-one-patient-out cross validation. RESULTS: The support vector regression model using the tract integrity and tract lesion overlap measurements predicted the 24-h NIHSS score with a high correlation value of r = 0.7. Using the tract overlap and tract integrity feature improved the modeling accuracy of NIHSS significantly by 6% (p < 0.05) compared to using overlap measures only. CONCLUSION: White matter tract integrity and lesion load are important predictors for clinical outcome after an acute ischemic stroke as measured by the NIHSS and should be integrated for predictive modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".