Modalités et spécificités de collaborations école-famille : étude de cas en REP dans l'Est réunionnais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La collaboration ecole-famille est un processus complexe qui oriente la reussite educative et scolaire des enfants des le primaire : elle prend un sens particulier a La Reunion. Les travaux de Larivee (2003) montrent son impact positif et en modelisent egalement les modalites au Canada. A partir de l'etude de cas d'une ecole elementaire d’un REP (reseau d’Education prioritaire) situee dans l’Est de La Reunion, cette etude consiste a decrire les modalites de collaboration parents/enseignants et le ressenti des eleves. Elle croise une methode quantitative et qualitative sur 5 etudes (questionnaires enseignants N = 59, parents N’=137, enfants N''' = 127 ; entretiens parents C ; entretiens enseignants (T= 30' ; N= 2) ; observation pratique d'un Conseil d'Ecole (T = 2h30) et dessins d'enfants (N = 10) . Les resultats montrent que les differents acteurs ne formulent pas les memes attentes ni les memes limites a la collaboration selon leurs profils. Des perspectives sont ouvertes pour l'intervention educative collaborative selon le profil des protagonistes de ce REP reunionnais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".