MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015119478

Fabrice Bourlez (2018) Queer Psychanalyse: Clinique mineure et déconstruction du genre

2019· article· fr· W3015119478 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fanny Gravel-Patry

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerHumanitiesPhilosophyDeconstruction (building)PsychologyPsychoanalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Queer Psychanalyse : Clinique mineure et deconstruction du genre, Fabrice Bourlez propose une reconciliation des theories queers et de la psychanalyse par l’intermediaire d’une clinique qui a pour but d’ouvrir notre comprehension des sexualites au-dela de la norme heterosexuelle. En faisant dialoguer les peres de la psychanalyse avec des theories cles de la pensee queer, Bourlez entrevoit dans cet ouvrage des facons de penser le pulsionnel, l’exces et la jouissance des corps, non plus comme des obstacles au « vrai » Moi, mais comme les berceaux meme de l’agency du patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.030
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207