MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MULTIPLICAR ESCOLAS E ESTAR NA CULTURA: ALGUMAS CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE A ESCOLA DOS TUPINAMBÁ DE OLIVENÇA/BA

2020· article· pt· W3015144089 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da FAEEBA- Educação e Contemporaneidade · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRural and Ethnic Education
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo pretendemos demonstrar, a partir da etnografia realizada sobre a escola dos Tupinambá de Olivença (BA), como esta instituição tem se tornado central para a defesa e demarcação do território, sobretudo nas áreas de retomadas. Ademais, interessa-nos refletir sobre a centralidade da escola para a produção de pessoas fortes na cultura, atualização e produção de parentesco e para aquilo que os Tupinambá definem como no estar na cultura. Nesse sentido, estar na cultura, para os Tupinambá, se traduz no processo de construir coletividades, e a escola tem sido um vetor importante nesse processo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it