MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015193621 · doi:10.18280/i2m.190109

A Wi-Fi Positioning System for Material Transport in Greenhouses

2020· article· en· W3015193621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yinggang Shi, Tian Yang, Shuo Zhang, Li Liu, Yongjie Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Mesure Métrologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouseEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringEngineeringAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In greenhouse farming, lots of materials need to be transported to the greenhouse in many phases.However, the current transport method is too costly and time-consuming to meet the material demand of modern greenhouses.To solve the problem, this paper presents a novel positioning system based on Wi-Fi for material transport in greenhouses.Firstly, the base station (BS) nodes were selected and deployed according to the signal attenuation model.Next, the STM32F103RE microcontroller and ESP8266 chip were adopted to design low-power positioning node and communication node.After that, a positioning algorithm was formulated based on received signal strength indication (RSSI) ranging and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE).Finally, the initial positioning system was verified through simulation and experiments, and then the vehicle posture was corrected with grayscale sensors and cross marks.After the correction, our Wi-Fi positioning system can position the targets in greenhouses accurately, enabling the unmanned vehicle to transport the materials required for sowing, fertilizing, picking, etc.Our research results provide a good reference for the design of indoor positioning systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Mesure MétrologieSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207