Hidden Life: Reanimating Victorian Tableaux Vivants in the Rutland Gate Album
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine une performance caritative de tableaux vivants présentée dans la demeure londonienne de Lady Winefred Howard en 1869. Cette première analyse de l’événement permet de repenser la portée et la signification des performances publiques de tableaux vivants dans la culture victorienne. L’intérêt scientifique récent pour la photographie mise en scène et la fabrication d’albums pendant la période victorienne a eu tendance à incorporer le tableau vivant au sein de l’histoire de la photographie. Cet article montre qu’il est tout aussi important de comprendre que la tradition parallèle de performances publiques offrait une plateforme de choix pour l’expérimentation sociale et vestimentaire, une porte d’entrée pour les figurant·es provenant des plus hautes sphères sociales vers les mondes artistiques bohémiens du mouvement esthétique victorien, et un site clé pour les catégories changeantes d’appartenance de classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".