Price allocation of transmission line usage in open access system using mega volt ampere kilometer and mega volt ampere cost method for integrated Nepal power system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The price allocation of transmission line usage for an open access system considering Integrated Nepal Power System (INPS) has been discussed in this paper using the MVA (mega volt ampere) - KM (kilometer) and MVA cost method. The price allocation has been compared for INPS (Integrated Nepal Power System) and IEEE 14 bus system. The transmission line costs in IEEE 14 bus system is based on average construction and operation cost whereas, the costs in the INPS is an actual cost of the present transmission system. The price has been first calculated for different bus with reference to slack bus and for different bilateral and multilateral transactions, using MW KM - MW cost and MVA KM - MVA cost methods. The active and apparent powers for the base case and transaction cases have been calculated using Newton Raphson Method. The prices from MVA KM - MVA cost method are higher than MW KM - MW cost method for both bilateral transaction and multi-lateral transaction indicating more reactive power support in addition to the real power loading due to transactions in the system. The result shows that MVA KM - MVA cost method requires incentives for reactive power support to the system such as INPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".