MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015348092 · doi:10.3138/seminar.56.2.3

Charisma und Gehorsam. Zur Semantik kolonialer <i>agency</i> in der deutschen Kolonialliteratur

2020· article· en· W3015348092 on OpenAlex
Elisabeth Hutter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismObedienceCharismaPower (physics)Context (archaeology)OppressionLegitimationSociologyAgency (philosophy)NeocolonialismBureaucracyGender studiesPolitical scienceHistoryLawSocial sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes German colonial literature as a genre preoccupied with issues of colonial power and obedience. While narratives concerned with colonial power usually centre on the relationship between the ruling colonizers and the (dis-)obedient colonized, I highlight the intricate correlation between the repressive militaristic drill and bureaucratic subordination in Wilhelmine culture and the longing for personal freedom in the colonial realm. The novels discussed here depict the challenges of establishing a functioning colonial administration and aim to establish colonial protagonists who are both obedient to bureaucratic rules and able to make independent decisions if necessary. Thus, the novels participate in a discourse on obedience and agency in a colonial context that is closely related to the domestic discourses of submission and oppression in the Kaiserreich.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it