MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3015398491

A Molecular Line Study of the Recently Discovered Class 0 Source Barnard 1-c

2005· article· en· W3015398491 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brenda C. Matthews, M. R. Hogerheijde, Edwin A. Bergin

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)Line (geometry)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a BIMA molecular line study of the class 0 source Barnard 1-c in the Perseus molecular cloud. As followup to the detection of an atypical polarization pattern in this young stellar object by Matthews & Wilson (2002), we have obtained high resolution data in CO, C¹⁸O, ¹³CO, HCO⁺, and N₂H⁺ from BIMA, plus N₂H⁺ data from FCRAO. N₂H⁺ is destroyed in the core centre and along the jet axis due to the high abundance of CO. The N₂H⁺ data demonstrate that this core is rotating (see Figure 1) with its rotation axis aligned with the observed molecular outflow. We have used high spectral resolution data of N₂H⁺ to measure the velocity and linewidths across the core. In addition, we present models of the SED (using BIMA, JCMT, IRAS and Spitzer data) generated with DUSTY in order to estimate the size scale of the evaporated region. We compare the morphology and kinematics of the B1-c core and jet to those of NGC 1333 IRAS 2 and IRAM 04191+1522, another very young class 0 source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→