Dual-Band High-Gain Planar Corrugated Antennas With Integrated Feeding Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a dual-band high-gain planar corrugated antenna is presented for applications in space and satellite communications. An analytic method based on the unit-cell analysis of a corrugated structure is presented to estimate the resonant frequency of the corrugated antenna where the maximum broadside gain happens. Therefore, the design of periodic corrugated antenna structures, which is very time-consuming due to the large size of the structure, is reduced to the design of a unit-cell of the structure which is very fast. A 2D corrugated (bull's-eye) antenna structure is then parametrically studied to find the parameters which affect the resonant frequency of the corrugated structures. A dual-band bull's-eye antenna with an integrated feeder structure at center is designed for the center frequencies of 9.7 GHz and 13.85 GHz. The dual-band operation is enabled using two different corrugations realized on two laminate boards. A prototype is fabricated and measured maximum broadside realized gains of 15. 8 and 17.5 dBi are achieved for the first and second bands, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".