MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015461659 · doi:10.1039/c9ra09521g

First principles study of Schottky barriers at Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>(100)/metal interfaces

2020· article· en· W3015461659 on OpenAlexaff
Ran Xu, Na Lin, Zhitai Jia, Yue‐Yang Liu, Haoyuan Wang, Yifei Yu, Xian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuantum tunnellingSchottky barrierFermi levelMetalMaterials scienceSemiconductorElectronic structureDensity functional theoryCondensed matter physicsSchottky diodeWork functionChemistryComputational chemistryOptoelectronicsPhysicsElectronMetallurgyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low Schottky barrier height (SBH) of metal–semiconductor contact is essential for achieving high performance electronic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRSC AdvancesSame topicGa2O3 and related materialsFrench-language works237,207