MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015482354 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1900073

Kainotropite, Cu4Fe3+O2(V2O7)(VO4), a new mineral with a complex vanadate anion from fumarolic exhalations of the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia

2020· article· en· W3015482354 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Igor V. Pekov, Natalia V. Zubkova, Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt, Yury S. Polekhovsky, Sergey N. Britvin, Anna G. Turchkova, Evgeny G. Sidorov, D.Y. Pushcharovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHematiteOrthorhombic crystal systemPleochroismMineralMineralogyChemistryCrystallographyCorundumGeologyHolotypeCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The new mineral kainotropite Cu4Fe3+O2(V2O7)(VO4) was found in sublimates of fumaroles related to the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. The holotype specimen originates from the Yadovitaya fumarole at the Second scoria cone of the Northern Breakthrough of the Great Tolbachik Fissure Eruption; associated minerals are hematite, langbeinite, calciolangbeinite, tenorite, piypite, lyonsite, rutile, pseudobrookite, sanidine, and lammerite. In paleo-fumarolic deposits of Mountain 1004 kainotropite is associated with diopside and hematite. It forms prismatic crystals up to 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.5 mm3, isolated or combined in clusters up to 0.7 mm across. Kainotropite is iron-black to reddish-black, with semi-metallic luster. Dcalc is 4.10 g/cm3. In reflected light, kainotropite is grey, weakly anisotropic. The reflectance values [Rmax–Rmin,% (λ, nm)] are: 18.3–17.3 (470), 17.3–16.3 (546), 16.9–15.7 (589), 16.3–15.1 (650). The chemical composition of the holotype sample (wt.%, electron microprobe) is: CuO 46.69, Al2O3 1.40, Fe2O3 10.04, TiO2 0.32, V2O5 37.58, As2O5 2.55, MoO3 0.76, total 99.34. The empirical formula, based on 13 O apfu, is: Cu3.96Fe3+0.85Al0.19Ti0.03(V2.78As0.15Mo0.04)Σ2.97O13. Kainotropite is orthorhombic, Pnma, a = 14.139(2), b = 6.7102(7), c = 11.4177(15) Å, V = 1083.3(2) Å3, and Z = 4. The strongest reflections of the powder XRD pattern [d,Å(I)(hkl)] are: 8.89(100)(101), 5.728(33)(002), 3.698(35)(212), 3.357(52)(020,203), 3.034(77)(220), 2.968(60)(303), and 2.655(27)(321,204). The crystal structure was solved from single-crystal XRD data, R = 0.085. Kainotropite represents a novel structure type. Cu2+ polyhedra (distorted tetragonal pyramids and strongly distorted octahedra) and Fe3+ octahedra are connected via common edges to form zigzag ribbons. Adjacent ribbons are connected by both V2O7 and VO4 groups (isolated from each other) to form a heteropolyhedral pseudo-framework. The name kainotropite is derived from the Greek word καινóτρoπoς, unusual, in allusion to its uncommon (for natural vanadates) anionic composition: it is the first mineral containing both pyrovanadate (V2O7)4– and orthovanadate (VO4)3– anions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207