MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015489785 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.75254

Ensuring nondiscrimination in pandemic prioritization decisions

2020· letter· en· W3015489785 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Matthew J. Weiss, Franco A. Carnevale, Bram Rochwerg, Simon Oczkowski, Sonny Dhanani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrioritizationTriagePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Life supportExtracorporealSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedical emergencyOperations researchComputer scienceMedicineIntensive care medicineBusinessVirologyEngineeringProcess managementDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with great interest the CMAJ commentary by Parhar and colleagues[1][1] that described triage protocols in Alberta for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) resources. However, we are concerned that it raises questions by not explicitly mentioning which preexisting medical conditions would

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207