High density of states in the pseudogap phase of the cuprate superconductor <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>HgBa</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CuO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> from low-temperature normal-state specific heat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The specific heat $C$ of the single-layer cuprate superconductor ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ was measured in an underdoped crystal with ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}=72$ K at temperatures down to 2 K in magnetic fields up to 35 T, a field large enough to suppress superconductivity at that doping ($p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$). In the normal state at $H=35$ T, a residual linear term of magnitude $\ensuremath{\gamma}=12\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$ is observed in $C/T$ as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, a direct measure of the electronic density of states. This high value of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ has two major implications. First, it is significantly larger than the value measured in overdoped cuprates outside the pseudogap phase ($p>\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{p}^{★}$), such as ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{Tl}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{6+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, where $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\simeq}7$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$. Given that the pseudogap causes a loss of density of states and assuming that ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ has the same $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ value as other cuprates at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, this implies that $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ in ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ must peak between $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$ and $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, namely, at (or near) the critical doping ${p}^{★}$ where the pseudogap phase is expected to end (${p}^{★}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.2$). Second, the high $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ value implies that the Fermi surface must consist of more than the single electronlike pocket detected by quantum oscillations in ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$, whose effective mass ${m}^{★}=2.7{m}_{0}$ yields only $\ensuremath{\gamma}=4.0$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$. This missing mass imposes a revision of the current scenario for how pseudogap and charge order, respectively, transform and reconstruct the Fermi surface of cuprates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".