MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015526097 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.014506

High density of states in the pseudogap phase of the cuprate superconductor <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>HgBa</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CuO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> from low-temperature normal-state specific heat

2020· article· lv· W3015526097 on OpenAlexafffund
C Girod, Anaëlle Legros, A. Forget, D. Colson, C. Marcenat, A. Demuer, David LeBoeuf, Louis Taillefer, T. Klein

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchInstitut quantiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsPseudogapCupratePhase (matter)SuperconductivityPhysicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The specific heat $C$ of the single-layer cuprate superconductor ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ was measured in an underdoped crystal with ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}=72$ K at temperatures down to 2 K in magnetic fields up to 35 T, a field large enough to suppress superconductivity at that doping ($p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$). In the normal state at $H=35$ T, a residual linear term of magnitude $\ensuremath{\gamma}=12\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$ is observed in $C/T$ as $T\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, a direct measure of the electronic density of states. This high value of $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ has two major implications. First, it is significantly larger than the value measured in overdoped cuprates outside the pseudogap phase ($p>\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{p}^{★}$), such as ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{Tl}}_{2}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{6+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, where $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\simeq}7$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$. Given that the pseudogap causes a loss of density of states and assuming that ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ has the same $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ value as other cuprates at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, this implies that $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ in ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ must peak between $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$ and $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.3$, namely, at (or near) the critical doping ${p}^{★}$ where the pseudogap phase is expected to end (${p}^{★}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.2$). Second, the high $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ value implies that the Fermi surface must consist of more than the single electronlike pocket detected by quantum oscillations in ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ at $p\ensuremath{\simeq}0.09$, whose effective mass ${m}^{★}=2.7{m}_{0}$ yields only $\ensuremath{\gamma}=4.0$ mJ/${\mathrm{K}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mol}$. This missing mass imposes a revision of the current scenario for how pseudogap and charge order, respectively, transform and reconstruct the Fermi surface of cuprates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207