Seasonal Related Multifactorial Control of Pituitary Gonadotropin and Growth Hormone in Female Goldfish: Influences of Neuropeptides and Thyroid Hormone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Female reproduction is under multifactorial control of brain-pituitary-peripheral origin. The present study provides information on seasonal changes in circulating LH and GH concentrations, as well as transcript levels for a number of genes involved in the regulation of reproduction and growth in female goldfish. We also provide information on the effects of treatments with GnRH and/or GnIH, and their interaction with T3, at three stages of gonadal recrudescence. Maximum basal concentration of LH was observed at late recrudescence (Spring) while no seasonal changes in basal serum GH levels was detected. Serum LH and GH levels were stimulated by GnRH as expected, depending on the season. GnIH stimulated basal GH concentrations in gonadally regressed fish. GnIH inhibitory action on GnRH-induced LH response was observed in late, but not in mid recrudescence. T3 actions on basal and GnRH- or GnIH-induced GH secretion were generally inhibitory, depending on season. Administration of T3 attenuated GnRH-induced LH responses in mid and late stages of gonadal recrudescence, and the presence of GnIH abolished inhibitory actions of T3 in fish at mid recrudescence. Our results also demonstrated seasonal patterns in basal and GnRH- and/or GnIH-induced transcript levels for ERα, ERβI, FSHR, aromatase, TRαI, TRβ, IGF-I, and Vtg in the liver and ovary. However, there were no clear correlations between changes in transcript levels and circulating levels of LH and GH. The results support the hypothesis that GnRH, GnIH, and T3 are contributing factors in complex reciprocal control of reproduction and growth in goldfish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".