MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015598440 · doi:10.1145/3140587.3062371

Low overhead dynamic binary translation on ARM

2017· article· en· W3015598440 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amanieu d'Antras, Cosmin Gorgovan, Jim Garside, Mikel Luján

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGPLAN Notices · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Society of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceBinary translationSpec#ARM architectureInstruction setOverhead (engineering)Parallel computingBenchmark (surveying)Embedded systemOut-of-order executionOperating systemSoftwareProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ARMv8 architecture introduced AArch64, a 64-bit execution mode with a new instruction set, while retaining binary compatibility with previous versions of the ARM architecture through AArch32, a 32-bit execution mode. Most hardware implementations of ARMv8 processors support both AArch32 and AArch64, which comes at a cost in hardware complexity. We present MAMBO-X64, a dynamic binary translator for Linux which executes 32-bit ARM binaries using only the AArch64 instruction set. We have evaluated the performance of MAMBO-X64 on three existing ARMv8 processors which support both AArch32 and AArch64 instruction sets. The performance was measured by comparing the running time of 32-bit benchmarks running under MAMBO-X64 with the same benchmark running natively. On SPEC CPU2006, we achieve a geometric mean overhead of less than 7.5% on in-order Cortex-A53 processors and a performance improvement of 1% on out-of-order X-Gene 1 processors. MAMBO-X64 achieves such low overhead by novel optimizations to map AArch32 floating-point registers to AArch64 registers dynamically, handle overflowing address calculations efficiently, generate traces that harness hardware return address prediction, and handle operating system signals accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGPLAN NoticesSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207