<i>Der Goldne Spiegel</i>: Zoopolitik und ‚gehorsame Handlungsmacht‘ im Staatsroman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obedience and agency are key concepts in Enlightenment political theory. In many cases they are conceptualized with zoopolitical metaphors. The man-animal divide is a crucial element that shapes the politics of the Enlightenment. In this article, after a brief introduction into Rousseau’s zoopolitical thinking, a debate on politics between Christoph Martin Wieland and Johann Heinrich Jacobi will show how animal metaphors are a latent feature of the popular Enlightenment of this era. After that, it is argued that Wieland’s novel Der Goldne Spiegel oder die Könige von Scheschian is able to shed light on the mechanics of zoopolitical thinking. This novel offers virulent narratives that connect animality, anthropology, and politics. Using techniques of multiperspectival narration, Der Goldne Spiegel can at the same time be read as revealing the aporia of Enlightenment zoopolitics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".