MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015748770 · doi:10.4000/eccs.3019

La « Troisième Solitude » du Canada vécue et transcrite par deux écrivaines autochtones : Jeannette Armstrong et Maria Campbell

2019· article· fr· W3015748770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isabelle Eloy-Carriat

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolitudeHumanitiesArtSociologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous nous intéresserons aux écrivains autochtones, en limitant notre étude à deux écrivaines autochtones canadiennes, Jeannette Armstrong et Maria Campbell. Isolées à double titre en tant que femmes et Autochtones, elles tenteront de briser « cette solitude », solitude intensifiée par le métissage pour Maria Campbell. Après l’expérience du militantisme et de la transmission de leurs valeurs, elles font l’expérience d’une forme de thérapie à travers l’affirmation de leur identité et elles œuvrent à la réconciliation de tout un peuple, d’abord au sein de leurs propres nations, et dans un second temps avec la société d’origine européenne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0300.015
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes canadiennes / Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207