MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015788509 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105467

An intensive multilocation temporal dataset of fungal communities in the root and rhizosphere of Brassica napus

2020· article· en· W3015788509 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Navid Bazghaleh, Steven D. Mamet, Jennifer K. Bell, Zayda Morales Moreira, Zelalem M. Taye, Shanay Williams, Melissa Arcand, Eric G. Lamb, Steven J. Shirtliffe, Sally Vail, Steven D. Siciliano, Bobbi L. Helgason

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsRhizosphereBrassicaMicrobiomeBiologyCropPopulationAgronomyBotanyBacteriaBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The plant microbiome has been recently recognized as a plant phenotype to help in the food security of the future population. However, global plant microbiome datasets are insufficient to be used effectively for breeding this new generation of crop plants. We surveyed the diversity and temporal composition of fungal communities in the root and rhizosphere of Brassica napus, the world's second largest oilseed crop, weekly in eight diverse lines at one site and every three weeks in sixteen lines, at three sites in 2016 and 2017 in the Canadian Prairies. 14,944 unique amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were detected based on the internal transcribed spacer region, with an average of 43 ASVs per root and 105 ASVs per rhizosphere sample. Temporal, site-to-site, and line-driven variability were key determinants of fungal community structure. This dataset is a valuable resource to systematically extract information on the belowground microbiome of diverse B. napus lines in different environments, at different times in the growing season, in order to adapt effective varieties for sustainable crop production systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207