Robust Online Composition, Routing and NF Placement for NFV-Enabled Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network function virtualization (NFV) fosters innovation in the networking field and reduces the complexity involved in managing modern-day conventional networks. Via NFV, the provisioning of a network service becomes more agile, whereby virtual network functions can be instantiated on commodity servers and data centers on demand. Network functions can be either mandatory or best-effort. The former type is strictly necessary for the correctness of a network service, whereas the latter is preferrable yet not necessary. In this paper, we study the online provisioning of NFV-enabled network services. We consider both unicast and multicast NFV-enabled services with multiple mandatory and best-effort NF instances. We propose a primal-dual based online approximation algorithm that allocates both processing and transmission resources to maximize a profit function, subject to resource constraints on physical links and NFV nodes. The online algorithm resembles a joint admission mechanism and an online composition, routing and NF placement framework. The online algorithm is derived from an offline formulation through a primal-dual based analysis. Such analysis offers direct insights and a fundamental understanding on the nature of the profit-maximization problem for NFV-enabled services with multiple resource types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".