Sphaerellothecium pumilum comb. nov. (hongos liquenícolas, Dothideomycetes), un nombre prioritario sobre S. aipolium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolPor las caracteristicas del hamatecio, se propone como nueva combinacion Sphaerellotheciumpumilum (Lettau) Nav.-Ros., Cl. Roux et Hafellner, para incluir Stigmidium pumilum (Lettau) Matzer et Hafellner. Sphaerellothecium aipolium Vouaux ex Nav.-Ros. et Cl. Roux es considerado un sinonimo de este taxon. Se comenta la reparticion geografica conocida de esta especie y se discuten algunos aspectos de su morfologia. Sphaerellothecium pumilum se menciona por primera vez para Liechtenstein, Rumania, Armenia, Mongolia, Nepal y Canada. EnglishBecause of the characteristics of the hamathecium, Sphaerellothecium pumilum (Lettau) Nav.-Ros., Cl. Roux et Hafellner is proposed as a new combination, to include Stigmidium pumilum (Lettau) Matzer and Hafellner. Sphaerellothecium aipolium Vouaux ex Nav.-Ros. et Cl. Roux is considered a synonym of this taxon. The current distribution of this species and some unclear aspects of its morphology are discussed.Sphaerellothecium pumilum is reported as new for Liechtenstein, Romania, Armenia, Mongolia, Nepal and Canada. francaisEn raison des caracteristiques de l'hamathecium, nous proposons la nouvelle combinaison Sphaerellotheciumpumilum (Lettau) Nav.-Ros., Cl. Roux et Hafellner, pour inclure Stigmidium pumilum (Lettau) Matzer et Hafellner. Sphaerellothecium aipolium Vouaux ex Nav.-Ros. et Cl. Roux est considere comme un synonyme de ce taxon. La repartition geographique connue de cette espece est commentee et certains aspects de sa morphologie sont discutes. Sphaerellothecium pumilum est signale comme nouveau en Liechtenstein, Roumanie, Armenie, Mongolie, Nepal et Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".