MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

APLICAÇÃO DO MÉTODO DE ELEMENTOS FINITOS PARA ANÁLISE DO DESLOCAMENTO ESTRUTURAL ESTÁTICO DE UMA FRESADORA CNC

2020· article· pt· W3015867205 on OpenAlexaff
Antônio Carlos Marangoni, Camila Colombari BOMFIM

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista AKEDIA Versões Negligências e Outros Mundos · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)Machine toolComputer scienceRigidity (electromagnetism)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringStructural engineeringClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an increasing demand for machines that replace manual labor.Naturally, it is clear that they must not only perform the job, but also have attributes of increasing precision in performance.In the present work, we have the design of a milling machine equipped with a computer numerical command (CNC), equipment that will be studied from the rigidity of the axes used for linear movements.Such axes will be examined in order to discover the existing static deflection.Our hypothesis is that this deflection is caused by the weight of the moving parts on the machine, a mobility widely used for this type of observation in complex geometry.The method used was that of finite elements, together with computers for the simulation, comparing the result with existing criteria in the literature, establishing the machine tool precision.As partial results, we saw that the deflection causes imperfections in the parallelism of the machined part and, in view of this problem, we propose that the measured values of the geometric imperfections can be inserted into the machine's CNC, thus obtaining better precision in the required shape of the part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista AKEDIA Versões Negligências e Outros MundosSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207