MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015869529 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202001165

Hierarchical Defective Fe<sub>3‐</sub><i><sub>x</sub></i>C@C Hollow Microsphere Enables Fast and Long‐Lasting Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

2020· article· en· W3015869529 on OpenAlexaff
Yongguang Zhang, Gaoran Li, Jiayi Wang, Guoliang Cui, Xiaoling Wei, Lingling Shui, Krzysztof Kempa, Guofu Zhou, Xin Wang, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolysulfideMaterials scienceSulfurElectrochemistryLithium (medication)Energy storageMesoporous materialNanotechnologyChemical engineeringCoatingRedoxElectrodeElectrolyteCatalysisChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries present one of the most promising energy storage systems owing to their high energy density and low cost. However, the commercialization of Li–S batteries is still hindered by several technical issues; the notorious polysulfide shuttling and sluggish sulfur conversion kinetics. In this work, unique hierarchical Fe3‐xC@C hollow microspheres as an advanced sulfur immobilizer and promoter for enabling high‐efficiency Li–S batteries is developed. The porous hollow architecture not only accommodates the volume variation upon the lithiation–delithiation processes, but also exposes vast active interfaces for facilitated sulfur redox reactions. Meanwhile, the mesoporous carbon coating establishes a highly conductive network for fast electron transportation. More importantly, the defective Fe3‐xC nanosized subunits impose strong LiPS adsorption and catalyzation, enabling fast and durable sulfur electrochemistry. Attributed to these structural superiorities, the obtained sulfur electrodes exhibit excellent electrochemical performance, i.e., high areal capacity of 5.6 mAh cm−2, rate capability up to 5 C, and stable cycling over 1000 cycles with a low capacity fading rate of 0.04% per cycle at 1 C, demonstrating great promise in the development of practical Li–S batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations183
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207