MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015885782 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.155407

Generalized input-output method to quantum transport junctions. II. Applications

2020· article· en· W3015885782 on OpenAlexafffund
Junjie Liu, Dvira Segal

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsCoupling (piping)Charge (physics)ElectronSeries (stratigraphy)QuantumPhononCurrent (fluid)VoltageElectron transport chainQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We apply our generalized input-output method (GIOM), introduced in the previous paper of this series, to prototype molecular junction models describing vibrationally coupled electron transport. In short junctions where analytic treatments are available, we show that the charge current obtained by the GIOM reduces to known limits and reasonably agrees with exact numerical simulations (when available). For extended junctions, we numerically reveal that the current displays a turnover from phonon-assisted to phonon-suppressed transport as a function of electronic and vibrational parameters. As an additional application, we consider a cavity-coupled molecular junction. Here we identify a cavity-induced suppression of charge current in the single-site case, and observe the coexistence of phononic and photonic sidebands in the current-voltage characteristics when both strong light-matter interaction and electron-vibration coupling are present. Together with the first paper of this series, we demonstrate that the input-output framework, which is normally employed in quantum optics, can serve as a powerful and feasible tool in the realm of electron transport junctions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207