Safety in moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis patients with latent tuberculosis treated with guselkumab and anti‐tuberculosis treatments concomitantly: results from pooled phase 3 VOYAGE 1 & VOYAGE 2 trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are at risk of new-onset tuberculosis (TB) or reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Association between TB/LTBI and interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors for psoriasis is unclear. Patients with LTBI typically initiate LTBI therapy before receiving biologics. OBJECTIVES: Safety in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients with LTBI treated with guselkumab (IL-23 inhibitor) and LTBI treatment was evaluated. METHODS: In the VOYAGE 1 & VOYAGE 2 studies, patients screened for LTBI were randomized to guselkumab, placebo, or adalimumab (TNF inhibitor) at baseline. Placebo → guselkumab crossover occurred at week 16 and adalimumab → guselkumab at week 52 (VOYAGE 1), or at week 28 or later (VOYAGE 2). Incidence of active TB, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and markedly abnormal liver function tests [alanine aminotransferase test (ALT); aspartate aminotransferase test (AST)] were evaluated using pooled data through week 100 in guselkumab-treated patients receiving and not receiving LTBI treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, 130 randomized patients (guselkumab: n = 69; adalimumab: n = 36; placebo: n = 25) tested positive for LTBI and received concomitant LTBI treatments (LTBI+). No active TB was reported among guselkumab-treated patients without LTBI (LTBI-) through week 100. Two cases of active TB occurred in LTBI- patients treated with adalimumab. Through week 16, across all treatment groups, greater proportions of LTBI+ patients reported ALT and AST elevations compared with LTBI- patients. Through week 100, proportions of patients experiencing AEs and SAEs were comparable between LTBI+ and LTBI- patients. CONCLUSIONS: No cases of active TB, including reactivation of LTBI, were reported in patients with or without LTBI treated with guselkumab through up to 2 years. LTBI treatment was effective across all treatment groups in preventing reactivation of LTBI. Long-term treatment with guselkumab was generally well-tolerated through up to 2 years in patients receiving LTBI medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".