MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015896477 · doi:10.1353/aim.2020.0013

Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief ed. by Ashlee Cunsolo and Karen Landman

2020· article· en· W3015896477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican imago · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuardianGlobal warmingGriefPopulationGeographyClimate changeHistoryPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyDemographyEcologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief ed. by Ashlee Cunsolo and Karen Landman Rick Crownshaw (bio) Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief, edited by Ashlee Cunsolo and Karen Landman. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2017. 332 pp. As testament to the fact that "ecological grief," the subject of this collection of essays, is no longer a purely academic concept, a recent academic survey—the Greenland Perspectives Survey—found a deterioration of mental health amongst the nation's scattered population, brought about by the impact of climate change on their daily lives. As the Guardian reports, the survey, carried out by the University of Copenhagen's Centre for Social Data Science, the Kraks Fond Institute for Urban Economic Research, and the University of Greenland, captured the opinions of residents of Greenland, whose voices are rarely heard in official and scientific discourses on climate change (McDougall, 2019). The lead author of the study, Kelton Minor, points out that the Arctic has been a "bellwether for the unequal impact of global warming on social and economic systems," and while many nations are struggling to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrialization levels, the populations of Greenland and the Artic region more generally have experienced such increases in temperature within a lifetime (as cited in McDougall, 2019). Put another way, this regional acceleration of global warming anticipates what is to come for the rest of the world, but presumably the point of this study was not just to turn the region into a prescient model. Rather, illuminating the discrepancy between states of mind on the ground and the data gathered from above—the sensors and satellites that monitor, track, scan, and measure the condition of Greenland's ice sheet, sea ice, glaciers, and icebergs—this study finds that the population, to varying degrees, is grief stricken about what the climate crisis is doing to their lives, those of their animals, and the ecosystems in which they live. Those ecosystems include, fundamentally, local sea ice, which acts as an "important social, ecological and economic platform," the destabilization (disappearance) of which disrupts the entanglements of ways of human and non-human life (Minor, [End Page 232] as cited in McDougall, 2019). The Guardian reports that the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado had calculated that 250 billion tonnes of ice have already been lost from Greenland. The social, cultural, and economic repercussions of the disruption of a way of life that is so tangibly entwined with the environment have resulted in deteriorating mental and physical health for Greenlanders, and especially Innuit communities. Courtney Howard, of the Canadian Association for Physicians for the Environment, describes the psychological and psychoanalytical conditions of those living in the Artic region by extending the definition of trauma and including climate-related anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and "ecological grief" over what has been lost or over what will be lost (ways of life and livelihoods, ecosystems, species) (McDougall, 2019). In the same month, in the sub-Arctic, Iceland mourned the loss of the glacier Okjokull, which was declassified in 2014 by the Icelandic Meteorologist Office. Between 1890 and 2012, it shrank from a sizeable 16 km2 to 0.7 km2, losing its status as glacier along the way. This mourning was ritualized and took funereal form. In lieu of the absent glacier, the focal point was a plaque bearing the inscription: "In the next 200 years all our glaciers are expected to follow the same path. This monument is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it" (Agence France-Presse, 2019). The plaque is entitled "A letter to the future," and ends with the date of its installation and "415 ppm CO2," the record-breaking level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as of May 2018. As one of the organizers, Professor Cymene Howe (of Rice University, Texas), points out, this was the first funeral for a glacier, but one that anticipates massive losses to come, given the estimates that Iceland will lose all of its 400...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican imagoSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207