SSRE: Cell Type Detection Based on Sparse Subspace Representation and Similarity Enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accurate identification of cell types from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data plays a critical role in a variety of scRNA-seq analysis studies. It corresponds to solving an unsupervised clustering problem, in which the similarity measurement between cells in a high dimensional space affects the result significantly. Although many approaches have been proposed recently, the accuracy of cell type identification still needs to be improved. In this study, we proposed a novel single-cell clustering framework based on similarity learning, called SSRE. In SSRE, we model the relationships between cells based on subspace assumption and generate a sparse representation of the cell-to-cell similarity, which retains the most similar neighbors for each cell. Besides, we adopt classical pairwise similarities incorporated with a gene selection and enhancement strategy to further improve the effectiveness of SSRE. For performance evaluation, we applied SSRE in clustering, visualization, and other exploratory data analysis processes on various scRNA-seq datasets. Experimental results show that SSRE achieves superior performance in most cases compared to several state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".