MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015976380 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.04.007

To intervene or not to intervene: Lessons learned from completion angiography after robotic-assisted coronary bypass surgery

2020· article· en· W3015976380 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amalia A. Winters, Michael E. Halkos

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionRevascularizationAnastomosisAtrial fibrillationCoronary artery diseaseArteryCardiologySurgeryPerioperativeCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyInternal medicineCoronary artery bypass surgeryAngiographyMyocardial infarctionAngina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is being increasingly performed and robotic-assisted left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) grafting has been shown to have comparable clinical outcomes to traditional CABG1 while avoiding the morbidity associated with sternotomy. Although completion angiography is not the standard of care for post-CABG patients, we have routinely performed an angiogram in patients after robotic-assisted CABG either in a hybrid room immediately after the procedure, or postoperatively in the catheterization lab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207