Vertical Drop Jump Performance in Youth With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is associated with altered body structure and function outcomes that may expose youth with JIA to a greater risk of secondary joint injury. This study aimed to examine differences in vertical drop jump (VDJ) biomechanics for youth with JIA and healthy youth (control group). METHODS: The present study was a matched pair cohort study. Youth with JIA (n = 30) and their age- and sex-matched control peers participated in this ethics-approved study. Lower-extremity biomechanics information was obtained using a motion analysis system (Motion Analysis) and 2 force plates (AMTI). Biomechanics outcomes included hip, knee, and ankle joint angles, ground reaction forces (GRF), and VDJ phase durations. Other outcomes included disease activity, physical disability, and sports participation. Matched pairs data (JIA-control) were analyzed using a multivariate random coefficient model (version 3.5.0, R Core Team; joint angles, potential confounders) and paired samples t-tests with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0125; GRF, VDJ phase durations). RESULTS: Youth with JIA had low disease activity, pain, and disability scores. Youth with JIA maintained a more erect posture at the hip (β = -4.0°, P = 0.004), knee (β = 7.5°, P = 0.004) and ankle (β = -2.6°, P = 0.001). GRF and phase durations outcomes did not meet criteria for significant differences. Knee extension increased with participant age (β = -1.0°, P = 0.002), while female participants displayed greater hip flexion (β = -6.6°, P = 0.001) and less ankle dorsiflexion (β = 2.3°, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for a stiff knee landing strategy by youth with JIA. These findings inform targets for physical therapy management to mitigate the risks of a secondary joint injury in sports participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".